Skip to content
SafetyRecord logoSafetyRecord

Hazard Communication: OSHA's Second Most Cited Standard

By Tomi, Data Analyst·Published May 27, 2026·Updated June 5, 2026

Hazard Communication is the standard that requires employers to tell workers about the chemicals they handle. In OSHA's enforcement data it is cited more often than almost any other rule. OSHA lists 1910.1200 as the second most frequently cited standard nationally, behind fall protection. Counts below are citations issued under 1910.1200 across federal and state-plan programs, by issuance year. Data queried June 5, 2026.

Citations by year

In the enforcement data, Hazard Communication citations rose from 6,191 in 2020 to 8,184 in 2024, with $7.72 million in current penalties on record for the 2024 citations.

YearHazard Communication citations
20206,191
20215,896
20227,004
20238,082
20248,184

Counts are citations issued under 29 CFR 1910.1200 across federal and state-plan programs, by issuance year. OSHA's official Top 10 is published at osha.gov/top10citedstandards.

2020
6,191
2021
5,896
2022
7,004
2023
8,082
2024
8,184
Citations under 29 CFR 1910.1200 by issuance year. Source: OSHA enforcement data.

Which parts of the standard are cited most

Most Hazard Communication citations come from a few specific requirements. In 2024 the most cited parts were:

SubsectionRequirement2024 citations
1910.1200(e)(1)Written hazard communication program2,567
1910.1200(h)(1)Employee information and training2,021
1910.1200(g)(8)Safety data sheets kept accessible871
1910.1200(g)(1)Safety data sheets587
1910.1200(f)(6)(ii)Workplace labeling518

The pattern is consistent year to year: the written program and worker training account for the largest share, followed by safety data sheet and labeling requirements.

What the standard requires

29 CFR 1910.1200 requires employers whose workers may be exposed to hazardous chemicals to maintain a written hazard communication program, label containers, keep a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical, and train employees on the hazards and protective measures. The standard is aligned with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals. The full regulatory text is published by the Office of the Federal Register at ecfr.gov (Title 29, Section 1910.1200). See also the most cited standard, fall protection.

Methodology and sources

Citation counts are from the OSHA violation table in the U.S. DOL enforcement data API, counted by citation issuance date, for standard code 1910.1200 and its subsections, federal and state-plan programs combined, delete-flagged records excluded. Penalty figures are current penalties on record. Standard text: Office of the Federal Register, eCFR Title 29, 1910.1200. Most-cited ranking: OSHA, osha.gov/top10citedstandards. No figures are estimated.

Frequently Asked Questions
What is OSHA's second most cited standard?

Hazard Communication, 29 CFR 1910.1200, is the second most frequently cited OSHA standard, behind fall protection.

How many Hazard Communication citations were issued in 2024?

The enforcement data records 8,184 citations under 1910.1200 in 2024, with $7.72 million in current penalties on record.

What part of Hazard Communication is cited most often?

The written hazard communication program requirement, 1910.1200(e)(1), with 2,567 citations in 2024, followed by employee training, 1910.1200(h)(1), with 2,021.

What does the Hazard Communication standard require?

A written program, container labels, a safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical, and employee training on chemical hazards and protective measures.

Data Source and Methodology

Data synced daily

Data on this page comes from the U.S. Department of Labor's OSHA enforcement database, accessed via the DOL public data API. Records are updated daily. We strive for accuracy, but errors in data processing or establishment grouping are possible. Penalty amounts reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts after informal conference, settlement, or judicial review. Company pages group inspection records by normalized employer name, city, and state as reported in OSHA records. That grouping is deterministic and non-fuzzy, but it is not a universal legal-entity identifier. If you believe any record is inaccurate, please report it and we will investigate. This product uses the DOL Data API but is not endorsed or certified by the DOL. For official and authoritative records, visit osha.gov.