CALDWELL TANKS, INC.
PUBLIC WORKS, 2200 LARK AVE WATER TANK #E5784, NAGS HEAD, NC 27959 · NAICS 332420 Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Sep 22, 2005#309313062Sep 22, 2005Programmed Related (I) · Partial scope, Safety#309313062$1,2252 viol.2 violations$1,225 in penalties
Inspection #309313062
Dates
- Opened
- Sep 22, 2005
- Closing Conference Date
- Sep 22, 2005
- Contested
- Nov 22, 2005
- Final Order
- Jul 24, 2007
- Closed
- Aug 7, 2007
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 242
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 2
- Violation Types
- 1 serious, 1 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $1,225
- Penalties on Record
- $1,225
- Site Address
- Public Works, 2200 Lark Ave Water Tank #e5784, Nags Head, NC 27959
- Industry
- 332420 Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing
Programmed Related Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a programmed related inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. The public DOL category label is preserved here without adding extra interpretation beyond the government label.
Violations
Violation list (2 of 2 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001A | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B01 | Serious | 1 | 5 | $1,225 | $1,225 | Oct 13, 2005 | Nov 22, 2005 | Jul 24, 2007 |
| 01001C | 1926.20 General Safety and Health Provisions OSHA citation code: 19260020 B02 | Other | 1 | 5 | $0 | $0 | Oct 13, 2005 | Nov 22, 2005 | Jul 24, 2007 |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing, 45,892 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: metal tank (heavy gauge) manufacturing reported 3.9 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 13.7%; NAICS 33242 level). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source