CHITO'S WELL SERVICE, LLC
800 NORTH OAK, STOCKTON, KS 67669 · NAICS 213112 Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Jul 12, 2002#305028441Jul 12, 2002FatalityAccident (A) · Complete scope, SafetyFatality#305028441$6,40010 viol.10 violations$6,400 in penalties
Inspection #305028441
Dates
- Opened
- Jul 12, 2002
- Closing Conference Date
- Sep 30, 2002
- Closed
- Dec 2, 2002
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 14
- Related Activity
- 1 accident
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 10
- Violation Types
- 9 serious, 1 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $6,400
- Penalties on Record
- $6,400
- Site Address
- 800 North Oak, Stockton, KS 67669
- Industry
- 213112 Support Activities for Oil and Gas Operations
Accident Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as an accident inspection in the U.S. Department of Labor OSHA enforcement data. Employers must report work-related fatalities within 8 hours, and work-related inpatient hospitalizations, amputations, or losses of an eye within 24 hours. An accident-related inspection does not by itself determine fault.
Incident Investigation Summaries
Incident investigation summaries linked to this inspection through OSHA's accident and injury enforcement data. These summaries describe the reported incident. The enforcement outcome for the linked inspection is in the inspection details above.
One employee killed, two injured when contacting power line
Violations
Violation list (10 of 10 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.151 Medical Services and First Aid OSHA citation code: 19100151 B | Serious | 1 | 3 | $450 | $450 | Nov 18, 2002 | - | - |
| 01002 | 1910.332 Electrical Safety-Related Work Practices - Training OSHA citation code: 19100332 B02 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $1,500 | $1,500 | Nov 18, 2002 | - | - |
| 01003A | 1910.333 Electrical - Selection and Use of Work Practices OSHA citation code: 19100333 C03 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $1,500 | $1,500 | Oct 8, 2002 | - | - |
| 01003B | 1910.333 Electrical - Selection and Use of Work Practices OSHA citation code: 19100333 C03 IIIA | Serious | 1 | 3 | $0 | $0 | Oct 8, 2002 | - | - |
| 01003C | 1910.333 Electrical - Selection and Use of Work Practices OSHA citation code: 19100333 C03 IIIB | Serious | 1 | 3 | $0 | $0 | Nov 18, 2002 | - | - |
| 01004 | 1910.335 Electrical - Safeguards OSHA citation code: 19100335 B01 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $1,500 | $1,500 | Oct 25, 2002 | - | - |
| 01005A | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 E01 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $450 | $450 | Nov 18, 2002 | - | - |
| 01005B | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 H01 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $0 | $0 | Nov 18, 2002 | - | - |
| 01005C | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 G08 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $0 | $0 | Nov 18, 2002 | - | - |
| 02001 | 1904.39 OSHA citation code: 19040039 A | Other | 1 | 3 | $1,000 | $1,000 | Oct 3, 2002 | - | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Source: U.S. Department of Labor OSHA incident investigation data (`osha_accident` + `osha_accident_injury`). Linked via `rel_insp_nr` to the inspection activity number (exact government key). Injury, body part, source and event values are OSHA's own codes. OSHA states that these fields are not coded according to the requirements under the Occupational Injury and Illness Classification System (OIICS). Only the values present in the OSHA record are listed; an incident with no value that resolves in OSHA's code table shows "Injury details not recorded". Where a record covers several people, each field lists every value recorded across them.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Support Activities for Mining, 8,932 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: support activities for oil and gas operations reported 0.8 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 14.2%). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source