KDC SYSTEMS
15541 GALE AVE., INDUSTRY, CA 91745 · NAICS 333922 Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
May 5, 2004#301332235May 5, 2004Complaint (B) · Partial scope, Safety#301332235$6003 viol.3 violations$600 in penalties
Inspection #301332235
Dates
- Opened
- May 5, 2004
- Closing Conference Date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Contested
- Nov 10, 2004
- Final Order
- Dec 20, 2004
- Closed
- Jun 28, 2005
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 300
- Related Activity
- 1 complaint
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 3
- Violation Types
- 3 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $3,920
- Penalties on Record
- $600
- Site Address
- 15541 Gale Ave., Industry, CA 91745
- Industry
- 333922 Conveyor and Conveying Equipment Manufacturing
Complaint Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a complaint inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. OSHA can open complaint-driven inspections after receiving safety or health complaints from workers or their representatives.
Violations
Violation list (3 of 3 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 3203 Injury and Illness Prevention Program OSHA citation code: 3203 A | Other | 1 | - | $135 | $0 | Jul 29, 2004 | Nov 10, 2004 | Dec 20, 2004 |
| 01002 | 3276 Portable Ladders OSHA citation code: 3276 B | Other | 1 | - | $410 | $300 | Jul 29, 2004 | Nov 10, 2004 | Dec 20, 2004 |
| 02001 | 3210 Guardrails at Elevated Locations OSHA citation code: 3210 B | Other | 1 | - | $3,375 | $300 | Jul 29, 2004 | Nov 10, 2004 | Dec 20, 2004 |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Machinery Manufacturing, 18,731 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: conveyor and conveying equipment manufacturing reported 2.4 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 11.2%). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source