LUNDA CONSTRUCTION
WABASHA BRIDGE, ST PAUL, MN 55102
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
May 15, 2013#317115467May 15, 2013Planned (H) · Complete scope, Safety#317115467$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #317115467
Dates
- Opened
- May 15, 2013
- Closing Conference Date
- May 15, 2013
- Closed
- May 22, 2013
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 1
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- Edgecumbe Rd & Hamline Ave S, St Paul, MN 55116
- Industry
- 237310 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
May 2, 2012#316485838May 2, 2012Planned (H) · Complete scope, Health#316485838$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #316485838
Dates
- Opened
- May 2, 2012
- Closing Conference Date
- May 11, 2012
- Closed
- May 14, 2012
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 5
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- Lafayette Bridge, Hwy 52, St Paul, MN 55155
- Industry
- 237310 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Aug 19, 2004#307943720Aug 19, 2004Planned (H) · Complete scope, Safety#307943720$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #307943720
Dates
- Opened
- Aug 19, 2004
- Closing Conference Date
- Aug 19, 2004
- Closed
- Aug 19, 2004
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 15
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- Hwy.52 Bridges & Eaton, Concord Sts. & Plato Blvd., St Paul, MN 55107
- Industry
- 237310 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Jun 4, 1996#126593458Jun 4, 1996Referral (C) · Partial scope, Health#126593458$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #126593458
Dates
- Opened
- Jun 4, 1996
- Closing Conference Date
- Jun 4, 1996
- Closed
- Jul 29, 1996
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 30
- Related Activity
- 1 referral
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- Wabasha Bridge, St Paul, MN 55102
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Referral Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a referral inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Referral inspections can result from another agency, another OSHA activity, or another source referring a potential hazard to OSHA.
Apr 14, 1992#120428396Apr 14, 1992Programmed Related (I) · Partial scope, Safety#120428396$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #120428396
Dates
- Opened
- Apr 14, 1992
- Closing Conference Date
- Apr 16, 1992
- Closed
- Apr 22, 1992
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 3
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- Bridge 05, Job 835-05, St Paul, MN 55155
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Programmed Related Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a programmed related inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. The public DOL category label is preserved here without adding extra interpretation beyond the government label.
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
5 inspections, 1992 to 2013. Each row is one inspection; point at or tap a row for its dates and totals.
Source: DOL OSHA enforcement data (inspections and violations), linked via activity_nr (exact government key).
Penalty changes: Amounts shown reflect what OSHA's enforcement record publishes. The reason for any change is not stated unless OSHA's record explicitly says so.
Short cases: When a case closed soon after it opened, the closed marker is drawn slightly to the right so both markers stay visible. Each row's card shows the exact dates.
Industry comparison
BLS 2024 survey: highway, street, and bridge construction reported 2.5 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 5.2%; NAICS 2373 level). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source