LW LAMB INC
I 196 AT KALAMAZOO RIVER, SAUGATUCK, MI 49453 · NAICS 237310 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Oct 15, 2007#308942903Oct 15, 2007Planned (H) · Complete scope, Safety#308942903$2633 viol.3 violations$263 in penalties
Inspection #308942903
Dates
- Opened
- Oct 15, 2007
- Closing Conference Date
- Oct 15, 2007
- Contested
- Dec 11, 2007
- Final Order
- Oct 14, 2008
- Closed
- Oct 29, 2008
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 3
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 3
- Violation Types
- 1 serious, 2 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $750
- Penalties on Record
- $263
- Site Address
- I 196 At Kalamazoo River, Saugatuck, MI 49453
- Industry
- 237310 Highway, Street, and Bridge Construction
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (3 of 3 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01002 | 4084063603 | Other | 1 | 3 | $375 | $0 | Nov 15, 2007 | Dec 11, 2007 | Oct 14, 2008 |
| 01004 | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B01 | Serious | 1 | 3 | $375 | $263 | Nov 15, 2007 | Dec 11, 2007 | Oct 14, 2008 |
| 02001 | 4084193704 | Other | 1 | 1 | $0 | $0 | Nov 15, 2007 | Dec 11, 2007 | Oct 14, 2008 |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction, 70,282 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: highway, street, and bridge construction reported 2.5 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 5.2%; NAICS 2373 level). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source