P. D. GEORGE COMPANY
5200 NORTH SECOND STREET, ST. LOUIS, MO 63147
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Mar 8, 2002#304326481Mar 8, 2002Planned (H) · Complete scope, Health#304326481$1,6887 viol.7 violations$1,688 in penalties
Inspection #304326481
Dates
- Opened
- Mar 8, 2002
- Closing Conference Date
- Jul 22, 2002
- Closed
- Oct 17, 2002
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 200
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 7
- Violation Types
- 2 serious, 5 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $3,375
- Penalties on Record
- $1,688
- Site Address
- 5200 North Second Street, St. Louis, MO 63147
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (7 of 7 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.22 OSHA citation code: 19100022 A02 | Serious | 1 | 25 | $1,500 | $750 | Sep 13, 2002 | - | - |
| 01002 | 1910.23 OSHA citation code: 19100023 C01 | Serious | 1 | 7 | $1,875 | $938 | Aug 15, 2002 | - | - |
| 02001 | 1910.22 OSHA citation code: 19100022 D01 | Other | 1 | 7 | $0 | $0 | Aug 15, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002 | 1910.29 OSHA citation code: 19100029 A04 II | Other | 1 | 10 | $0 | $0 | Aug 15, 2002 | - | - |
| 02003 | 1910.119 Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals OSHA citation code: 19100119 O01 | Other | 1 | 25 | $0 | $0 | Aug 15, 2002 | - | - |
| 02004 | 1910.134 Respiratory Protection OSHA citation code: 19100134 H01 | Other | 1 | 1 | $0 | $0 | Aug 15, 2002 | - | - |
| 02005 | 1910.134 Respiratory Protection OSHA citation code: 19100134 H02 I | Other | 1 | 1 | $0 | $0 | Aug 15, 2002 | - | - |
Apr 19, 1991#106571383Apr 19, 1991Complaint (B) · Partial scope, Safety#106571383$1,9805 viol.5 violations$1,980 in penalties
Inspection #106571383
Dates
- Opened
- Apr 19, 1991
- Closing Conference Date
- May 17, 1991
- Closed
- Sep 4, 1991
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 160
- Related Activity
- 1 complaint
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 5
- Violation Types
- 5 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $3,375
- Penalties on Record
- $1,980
- Site Address
- 5200 North Second Street, St. Louis, MO 63147
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Complaint Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a complaint inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. OSHA can open complaint-driven inspections after receiving safety or health complaints from workers or their representatives.
Violations
Violation list (5 of 5 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.23 OSHA citation code: 19100023 C01 | Other | 1 | 1 | $1,575 | $660 | Aug 26, 1991 | - | - |
| 01003 | 1910.147 The control of hazardous energy (lockout/tagout) OSHA citation code: 19100147 C04 I | Other | 1 | 11 | $900 | $660 | Aug 26, 1991 | - | - |
| 01004 | 1910.307 Hazardous (classified) locations OSHA citation code: 19100307 B | Other | 2 | 4 | $900 | $660 | Sep 26, 1991 | - | - |
| 02001 | 1910.37 OSHA citation code: 19100037 I | Other | 1 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Aug 26, 1991 | - | - |
| 02002 | 1910.106 OSHA citation code: 19100106 E02 IIB | Other | 1 | 1 | $0 | $0 | Jul 15, 1991 | - | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
2 inspections, 1991 to 2002. Each row is one inspection; point at or tap a row for its dates and totals.
Source: DOL OSHA enforcement data (inspections and violations), linked via activity_nr (exact government key).
Penalty changes: Amounts shown reflect what OSHA's enforcement record publishes. The reason for any change is not stated unless OSHA's record explicitly says so.