TIMKEN-CLINTON PLANT
1775 TORRINGTON ROAD, CLINTON, SC 29325 · NAICS 332991 Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Feb 1, 2005#308233170Feb 1, 2005Referral (C) · Partial scope, Health#308233170$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #308233170
Dates
- Opened
- Feb 1, 2005
- Closing Conference Date
- Mar 21, 2005
- Closed
- Apr 4, 2005
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 800
- Related Activity
- 1 referral
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- 1775 Torrington Road, Clinton, SC 29325
- Industry
- 332991 Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing
Referral Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a referral inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Referral inspections can result from another agency, another OSHA activity, or another source referring a potential hazard to OSHA.
Jul 20, 2004#307436303Jul 20, 2004Planned (H) · Complete scope, Safety#307436303$6,0509 viol.9 violations$6,050 in penalties
Inspection #307436303
Dates
- Opened
- Jul 20, 2004
- Closing Conference Date
- Jul 28, 2004
- Closed
- Dec 2, 2004
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 900
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 9
- Violation Types
- 8 serious, 1 repeat
- Initial Penalties
- $22,950
- Penalties on Record
- $6,050
- Site Address
- 1775 Torrington Road, Clinton, SC 29325
- Industry
- 332991 Ball and Roller Bearing Manufacturing
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (9 of 9 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 10012 OSHA citation code: 10012 A | Serious | 1 | 1 | $1,750 | $700 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 01002 | 1910.106 Flammable Liquids OSHA citation code: 19100106 E06 II | Serious | 1 | 1 | $1,400 | $560 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 01006 | 1910.304 Electrical - Wiring Design and Protection OSHA citation code: 19100304 F04 | Serious | 3 | 3 | $1,050 | $420 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 01007 | 1910.305 Electrical - Wiring Methods, Components, and Equipment OSHA citation code: 19100305 B01 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $1,750 | $700 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 01008A | 1910.212 General Requirements for All Machines (Machine Guarding) OSHA citation code: 19100212 A02 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $0 | $420 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 01008B | 1910.212 General Requirements for All Machines (Machine Guarding) OSHA citation code: 19100212 A05 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $0 | $0 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 01008C | 1910.219 Mechanical Power-Transmission Apparatus OSHA citation code: 19100219 M01 I | Serious | 7 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 02001 | 1910.23 Ladders OSHA citation code: 19100023 C01 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $10,625 | $700 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
| 02002 | 1910.217 Mechanical Power Presses OSHA citation code: 19100217 C02 I | Repeat | 1 | 1 | $6,375 | $2,550 | Aug 31, 2004 | - | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
2 inspections, 2004 to 2005. Each row is one inspection; point at or tap a row for its dates and totals.
Source: DOL OSHA enforcement data (inspections and violations), linked via activity_nr (exact government key).
Penalty changes: Amounts shown reflect what OSHA's enforcement record publishes. The reason for any change is not stated unless OSHA's record explicitly says so.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing, 48,574 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: ball and roller bearing manufacturing reported 2.4 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 11.0%). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source