ANN ARBOR CTY PARKS & FORESTRY DIV
415 W WASHINGTON ST, ANN ARBOR, MI 48103
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
May 11, 2002#125157685May 11, 2002Complaint (B) · Partial scope, Health#125157685$4,5001 viol.1 violation$4,500 in penalties
Inspection #125157685
Dates
- Opened
- May 11, 2002
- Closing Conference Date
- Jun 28, 2002
- Closed
- Sep 11, 2002
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Local government
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 55
- Related Activity
- 1 complaint
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 1
- Violation Types
- 1 repeat
- Initial Penalties
- $4,500
- Penalties on Record
- $4,500
- Site Address
- 415 W Washington St, Ann Arbor, MI 48103
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Complaint Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a complaint inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. OSHA can open complaint-driven inspections after receiving safety or health complaints from workers or their representatives.
Violations
Violation list (1 of 1 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.1001 Asbestos OSHA citation code: 19101001 J07 IV | Repeat | 1 | 1 | $4,500 | $4,500 | Aug 11, 2002 | - | - |
Dec 10, 2001#125165928Dec 10, 2001Complaint (B) · Complete scope, Health#125165928$3,81310 viol.10 violations$3,813 in penalties
Inspection #125165928
Dates
- Opened
- Dec 10, 2001
- Closing Conference Date
- Dec 10, 2001
- Closed
- Apr 9, 2002
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Local government
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 40
- Related Activity
- 1 complaint
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 10
- Violation Types
- 9 serious, 1 repeat
- Initial Penalties
- $7,625
- Penalties on Record
- $3,813
- Site Address
- 415 W Washington St, Ann Arbor, MI 48103
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Complaint Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a complaint inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. OSHA can open complaint-driven inspections after receiving safety or health complaints from workers or their representatives.
Violations
Violation list (10 of 10 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.1001 Asbestos OSHA citation code: 19101001 J07 IV | Repeat | 1 | 1 | $1,750 | $875 | Mar 27, 2002 | - | - |
| 02001 | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 F01 | Serious | 1 | 4 | $875 | $438 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002A | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 E01 | Serious | 1 | 4 | $2,500 | $1,250 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002B | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 E06 | Serious | 1 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002C | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 G09 | Serious | 1 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002D | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 H01 | Serious | 1 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002E | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 I01 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $0 | $0 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02002F | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 J02 I | Serious | 1 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
| 02003A | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 K09 I | Serious | 1 | 4 | $2,500 | $1,250 | Mar 27, 2002 | - | - |
| 02003B | 1926.1101 Asbestos (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261101 K03 II | Serious | 1 | 4 | $0 | $0 | Feb 28, 2002 | - | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
2 inspections, 2001 to 2002. Each row is one inspection; point at or tap a row for its dates and totals.
Source: DOL OSHA enforcement data (inspections and violations), linked via activity_nr (exact government key).
Penalty changes: Amounts shown reflect what OSHA's enforcement record publishes. The reason for any change is not stated unless OSHA's record explicitly says so.