AMERICAN INSULATION CO INC
#2 ALKY TEXACO REFINERY, Port Arthur, TX 77640
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Nov 23, 1982#16788317Nov 23, 1982Unprogrammed Related (G) · Partial scope, Health#16788317$00 viol.0 violations$0 in penalties
Inspection #16788317
Dates
- Opened
- Nov 23, 1982
- Closing Conference Date
- Jan 11, 1983
- Closed
- Jul 1, 1983
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- Not recorded
- Owner Type
- Not recorded
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 30
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 0
- Initial Penalties
- $0
- Penalties on Record
- $0
- Site Address
- Texaco Port Arthur Refinery, Port Arthur, TX 77640
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Unprogrammed Related Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as an unprogrammed related inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. The public DOL category label is preserved here without adding extra interpretation beyond the government label.
Mar 31, 1978#16812760Mar 31, 1978Planned (H) · Partial scope, Safety#16812760$1,00010 viol.10 violations$1,000 in penalties
Inspection #16812760
Dates
- Opened
- Mar 31, 1978
- Closing Conference Date
- Mar 31, 1978
- Contested
- Jun 15, 1978
- Final Order
- May 15, 1979
- Closed
- Aug 3, 1979
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- Not recorded
- Owner Type
- Not recorded
- Union Status
- Yes
- Number of Employees
- 40
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 10
- Violation Types
- 10 serious
- Initial Penalties
- $4,380
- Penalties on Record
- $1,000
- Site Address
- #2 Alky Texaco Refinery, Port Arthur, TX 77640
- Industry
- Not classified in OSHA's inspection record.
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (10 of 10 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.27 Scaffolds and Rope Descent Systems OSHA citation code: 19100027 D02 | Serious | 1 | - | $480 | $200 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01002A | 1926.28 Personal Protective Equipment OSHA citation code: 19260028 A | Serious | 1 | - | $420 | $100 | May 18, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01002B | 1926.28 Personal Protective Equipment OSHA citation code: 19260028 A | Serious | 2 | - | $0 | $0 | May 16, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01003 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 A10 | Serious | 1 | - | $480 | $100 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01004 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 A13 | Serious | 1 | - | $540 | $100 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01005 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 A14 | Serious | 1 | - | $480 | $100 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01006 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 C05 | Serious | 1 | - | $540 | $100 | Jun 5, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01007 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 C09 | Serious | 1 | - | $480 | $100 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01008 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 C13 | Serious | 1 | - | $540 | $100 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
| 01009 | 1926.500 Fall Protection - Scope, Application, and Definitions OSHA citation code: 19260500 B08 | Serious | 1 | - | $420 | $100 | May 22, 1978 | Jun 15, 1978 | May 15, 1979 |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
2 inspections, 1978 to 1982. Each row is one inspection; point at or tap a row for its dates and totals.
Source: DOL OSHA enforcement data (inspections and violations), linked via activity_nr (exact government key).
Penalty changes: Amounts shown reflect what OSHA's enforcement record publishes. The reason for any change is not stated unless OSHA's record explicitly says so.