HECTOR MAYEN
LOT# 260 FALL FISH COURT, NEW MARKET, MD 21774 · NAICS 238130 Framing Contractors
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
May 31, 2019#344052634May 31, 2019Final Order RecordedPlanned (H) · Complete scope, SafetyFinal Order Recorded#344052634$26,80018 viol.18 violations$26,800 in penalties
Inspection #344052634
Dates
- Opened
- May 31, 2019
- Closing Conference Date
- May 31, 2019
- Final Order
- Sep 20, 2019
- Closed
- No close date in inspection feed
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 6
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 18
- Violation Types
- 5 serious, 11 repeat, 2 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $26,800
- Penalties on Record
- $26,800
- Site Address
- Lot# 260 Fall Fish Court, New Market, MD 21774
- Industry
- 238130 Framing Contractors
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (18 of 18 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001A | 1926.1428 Signal person qualifications OSHA citation code: 19261428 A | Serious | 1 | 6 | $1,200 | $1,200 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 01001B | 1926.1428 Signal person qualifications OSHA citation code: 19261428 C01 | Serious | 1 | 6 | $0 | $0 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 01001C | 1926.1430 Training OSHA citation code: 19261430 B | Serious | 1 | 6 | $0 | $0 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 01002 | 05-104(A) | Serious | 1 | 5 | $1,200 | $1,200 | Aug 2, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 01003 | 09.12.26.08B(1) | Serious | 1 | 6 | $1,200 | $1,200 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 02001 | 1926.20 General Safety and Health Provisions OSHA citation code: 19260020 B01 | Repeat | 1 | 6 | $2,800 | $2,800 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 02002 | 1926.20 General Safety and Health Provisions OSHA citation code: 19260020 B02 | Repeat | 1 | 5 | $2,800 | $2,800 | Aug 2, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 02003 | 1926.102 Eye and Face Protection (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19260102 A01 | Repeat | 1 | 5 | $2,400 | $2,400 | - | Sep 20, 2019 | |
| 02004 | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B13 | Repeat | 1 | 5 | $2,800 | $2,800 | - | Sep 20, 2019 | |
| 02005 | 1926.503 Fall Protection - Training Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260503 A01 | Repeat | 1 | 6 | $2,800 | $2,800 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 02006 | 1926.1053 Ladders (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261053 B01 | Repeat | 1 | 5 | $2,400 | $2,400 | - | Sep 20, 2019 | |
| 02007 | 1926.1060 Stairways and Ladders - Training (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261060 A | Repeat | 1 | 6 | $2,400 | $2,400 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 03001 | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 E01 | Repeat | 1 | 6 | $1,200 | $1,200 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 03002 | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 G01 | Repeat | 1 | 5 | $1,200 | $1,200 | Aug 2, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 03003 | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 H01 | Repeat | 1 | 6 | $1,200 | $1,200 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 03004 | 1926.1053 Ladders (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261053 B13 | Repeat | 1 | 5 | $1,200 | $1,200 | - | Sep 20, 2019 | |
| 04001 | 09.12.26.05A | Other | 1 | 2 | $0 | $0 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
| 04002 | 09.12.26.09A | Other | 1 | 2 | $0 | $0 | Aug 27, 2019 | - | Sep 20, 2019 |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Specialty Trade Contractors, 551,694 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: framing contractors reported 4.6 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 9.8%; NAICS 23813 level). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source