SCHAUER CONSTRUTION CO. INC.
128 MAIN ST., CANON CITY, CO 81212 · NAICS 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Sep 5, 2003#306226044Sep 5, 2003Complaint (B) · Partial scope, Safety#306226044$4,69017 viol.17 violations$4,690 in penalties
Inspection #306226044
Dates
- Opened
- Sep 5, 2003
- Closing Conference Date
- Sep 5, 2003
- Closed
- Nov 26, 2003
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 1
- Related Activity
- 1 complaint
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 17
- Violation Types
- 17 serious
- Initial Penalties
- $8,550
- Penalties on Record
- $4,690
- Site Address
- 128 Main St., Canon City, CO 81212
- Industry
- 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Complaint Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a complaint inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. OSHA can open complaint-driven inspections after receiving safety or health complaints from workers or their representatives.
Violations
Violation list (17 of 17 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B01 | Serious | 6 | 16 | $1,500 | $825 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01002A | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B04 I | Serious | 4 | 16 | $1,500 | $825 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01002B | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B04 II | Serious | 15 | 16 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01002C | 1926.502 Fall Protection Systems Criteria and Practices OSHA citation code: 19260502 B13 | Serious | 1 | 16 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01003A | 1926.502 Fall Protection Systems Criteria and Practices OSHA citation code: 19260502 B01 | Serious | 1 | 16 | $1,500 | $825 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01003B | 1926.502 Fall Protection Systems Criteria and Practices OSHA citation code: 19260502 B04 | Serious | 1 | 16 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01003C | 1926.502 Fall Protection Systems Criteria and Practices OSHA citation code: 19260502 B09 | Serious | 1 | 16 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01004A | 1926.752 Steel Erection - Site Layout and Construction Sequence OSHA citation code: 19260752 A01 | Serious | 1 | 5 | $375 | $200 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01004B | 1926.752 Steel Erection - Site Layout and Construction Sequence OSHA citation code: 19260752 A02 | Serious | 2 | 5 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01005A | 1926.757 Open web steel joists OSHA citation code: 19260757 A01 | Serious | 1 | 5 | $1,500 | $825 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01005B | 1926.757 Open web steel joists OSHA citation code: 19260757 A06 | Serious | 10 | 5 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01006 | 1926.759 Falling object protection OSHA citation code: 19260759 B | Serious | 1 | 6 | $300 | $165 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01007A | 1926.760 Steel Erection - Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260760 A02 | Serious | 5 | 5 | $1,500 | $825 | Oct 23, 2003 | - | - |
| 01007B | 1926.760 Steel Erection - Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260760 B01 | Serious | 1 | 2 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01007C | 1926.760 Steel Erection - Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260760 B03 | Serious | 2 | 2 | $0 | $0 | Oct 22, 2003 | - | - |
| 01008A | 1926.1053 Ladders (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261053 B01 | Serious | 1 | 2 | $375 | $200 | Oct 20, 2003 | - | - |
| 01008B | 1926.1053 Ladders (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19261053 B07 | Serious | 1 | 2 | $0 | $0 | Oct 20, 2003 | - | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Construction of Buildings, 209,253 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: nonresidential building construction reported 1.9 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 6.8%; NAICS 2362 level). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source