SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER ENTERPRISES, INC
1400 PONTIAC AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02920 · NAICS 333993 Packaging Machinery Manufacturing
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Jan 27, 2009#312340425Jan 27, 2009Referral (C) · Partial scope, Safety#312340425$15,0003 viol.3 violations$15,000 in penalties
Inspection #312340425
Dates
- Opened
- Jan 27, 2009
- Closing Conference Date
- Feb 25, 2009
- Contested
- Mar 30, 2009
- Closed
- Dec 5, 2009
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 89
- Related Activity
- 1 referral
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 3
- Violation Types
- 1 serious, 2 other-than-serious
- Initial Penalties
- $35,000
- Penalties on Record
- $15,000
- Site Address
- 1400 Pontiac Avenue, Cranston, RI 02920
- Industry
- 333993 Packaging Machinery Manufacturing
Referral Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a referral inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Referral inspections can result from another agency, another OSHA activity, or another source referring a potential hazard to OSHA.
Violations
Violation list (3 of 3 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.332 Electrical Safety-Related Work Practices - Training OSHA citation code: 19100332 B01 | Other | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 | Mar 25, 2009 | Mar 30, 2009 | - |
| 01002 | 1910.333 Electrical - Selection and Use of Work Practices OSHA citation code: 19100333 A01 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $5,000 | $5,000 | Mar 25, 2009 | Mar 30, 2009 | - |
| 01003 | 1910.137 Electrical Protective Equipment OSHA citation code: 19100137 B02 VIII | Other | 1 | 1 | $25,000 | $5,000 | Mar 25, 2009 | Mar 30, 2009 | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Machinery Manufacturing, 17,986 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: packaging machinery manufacturing reported 1.0 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 14.9%). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source