OMC MASONRY, INC.
7751 GATEWAY LANE, CONCORD, NC 28027 · NAICS 238140 Masonry Contractors
Having inspection records is common for businesses in regulated industries. Data and methodology
Inspection records
Dec 7, 2004#308366699Dec 7, 2004Planned (H) · Complete scope, Safety#308366699$9003 viol.3 violations$900 in penalties
Inspection #308366699
Dates
- Opened
- Dec 7, 2004
- Closing Conference Date
- Dec 7, 2004
- Closed
- Mar 28, 2005
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 2
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 3
- Violation Types
- 3 serious
- Initial Penalties
- $1,500
- Penalties on Record
- $900
- Site Address
- 7751 Gateway Lane, Concord, NC 28027
- Industry
- 238140 Masonry Contractors
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (3 of 3 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1910.1200 Hazard Communication OSHA citation code: 19101200 E01 | Serious | 1 | 2 | $500 | $300 | Jan 31, 2005 | - | - |
| 01002 | 1926.50 Medical Services and First Aid (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19260050 G | Serious | 1 | 2 | $500 | $300 | Jan 31, 2005 | - | - |
| 01003 | 1926.102 Eye and Face Protection (Construction) OSHA citation code: 19260102 A01 | Serious | 1 | 2 | $500 | $300 | Jan 31, 2005 | - | - |
Nov 9, 2004#308451277Nov 9, 2004Planned (H) · Partial scope, Health#308451277$1,8005 viol.5 violations$1,800 in penalties
Inspection #308451277
Dates
- Opened
- Nov 9, 2004
- Closing Conference Date
- Nov 9, 2004
- Closed
- Aug 10, 2005
Inspection
- Advance Notice
- No
- Owner Type
- Private
- Union Status
- No
- Number of Employees
- 5
Violations and Penalties
- Total Violations
- 5
- Violation Types
- 3 serious, 2 repeat
- Initial Penalties
- $6,300
- Penalties on Record
- $1,800
- Site Address
- 7751 Gateway Lane, Concord, NC 28027
- Industry
- 238140 Masonry Contractors
Planned Inspection: This inspection record is categorized as a planned inspection in the DOL OSHA enforcement data. Planned inspections are part of OSHA's scheduled enforcement activity rather than being opened directly from a complaint or reported incident at that worksite.
Violations
Violation list (5 of 5 shown)
| Citation | Standard | Type | Instances | Exposed | Initial | Current | Abatement | Contest | Final Order |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01001 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 G01 | Repeat | 2 | 2 | $2,100 | $600 | Dec 1, 2004 | - | - |
| 01002 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 B01 I | Repeat | 1 | 1 | $2,100 | $600 | Dec 1, 2004 | - | - |
| 02001 | 1926.451 Scaffolding - General Requirements OSHA citation code: 19260451 C02 V | Serious | 1 | 1 | $700 | $200 | Dec 1, 2004 | - | - |
| 02002 | 1926.501 Fall Protection - Duty to Have Fall Protection OSHA citation code: 19260501 B01 | Serious | 1 | 1 | $700 | $200 | Dec 1, 2004 | - | - |
| 02003 | 1926.706 Concrete and Masonry - Masonry Construction OSHA citation code: 19260706 B | Serious | 1 | 2 | $700 | $200 | Dec 1, 2004 | - | - |
Penalty amounts may differ from final amounts after settlement or judicial review. How to read these records
About these records
A company page groups inspections with the same normalized employer name, city and state; it is not a legal-entity identifier (how pages are grouped).
This page displays public OSHA enforcement data. Status text follows the DOL inspection record first and may include citation-level context when the inspection feed and citation records are out of sync. Penalty amounts shown reflect the latest penalty amounts on record in the DOL database and may differ from initial assessments or final amounts. This is not an official OSHA resource.
OSHA's public enforcement data does not publish a "guilty" or "not guilty" field for inspections. The closest outcome fields available are the citation counts, penalty amounts, contest dates, final-order dates, and the inspection close date shown on this page. How to interpret these status fields. How initial and current penalties are recorded.
OSHA may publish multiple citation rows in the same inspection with the same standard and penalty fields. Separate rows can still differ in OSHA metadata such as citation identifier, recorded instance count, exposed workers, or gravity value. Contest and Final Order columns show citation-level dates from OSHA's enforcement record. A dash means OSHA's record does not currently show that activity for the citation.
Understanding These Penalties
The maximum penalty for a serious violation in 2025 is $16,550 per violation. For willful violations, the range is $11,823 to $165,514. The current penalty column shows the latest amount on record in OSHA's database for each citation. When the current penalty differs from the initial penalty, OSHA's records show that the amount changed during the enforcement process, but this page does not determine the specific reason for each change. Penalty amounts are set by OSHA and adjusted annually for inflation.
2 inspections, 2004 to 2004. Each row is one inspection; point at or tap a row for its dates and totals.
Source: DOL OSHA enforcement data (inspections and violations), linked via activity_nr (exact government key).
Penalty changes: Amounts shown reflect what OSHA's enforcement record publishes. The reason for any change is not stated unless OSHA's record explicitly says so.
Standards cited
Industry comparison
Specialty Trade Contractors, 559,279 employers with OSHA inspections. Arithmetic from DOL records.
BLS 2024 survey: masonry contractors reported 1.9 injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers (total recordable cases, national, private industry; relative standard error 15.2%; NAICS 23814 level). This is an industry-wide average from a federal survey, not a measurement of this establishment. Source